Evidence
Delta Analysis
Blind evaluation by GPT-5 across 30 analytical dimensions. Configured output (using inference-time cognitive configuration) vs. default output from the same model on the same prompt.
Overall Score
9.2vs7.8
Average across all dimensions
Semantic Density
0.106vs0.055
Concepts per word
Meta-Reasoning
+8point advantage
On meta-cognitive execution
Dimension-by-Dimension Comparison
Placeholder data — full 30-dimension dataset will replace this.
DimensionConfiguredDefaultDelta
Analytical Depth9.57.2+2.3
Structural Coherence9.38.0+1.3
Novel Insight Generation9.46.8+2.6
Meta-Cognitive Awareness9.65.5+4.1
Constraint Satisfaction9.17.9+1.2
Semantic Density9.07.0+2.0
Epistemic Precision9.37.5+1.8
Framework Originality9.56.2+3.3
Counter-Argument Handling9.27.8+1.4
Practical Actionability8.88.1+0.7
Reasoning Transparency9.47.3+2.1
Information Prioritization9.66.9+2.7
Semantic Density Comparison
Configured Output0.106
Default Output0.055
Unit: concepts per word. Higher = more information per token.
Want to see how your own AI outputs compare?
Try The Inference Auditor